<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A query query</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/10/22/a-query-query/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/10/22/a-query-query/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary about patent law, i.p. law, creativity, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/10/22/a-query-query/#comment-5576</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/10/22/a-query-query/#comment-5576</guid>
		<description>Bob,
Excellent help!
Thank you,
Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,<br />
Excellent help!<br />
Thank you,<br />
Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/10/22/a-query-query/#comment-5575</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/10/22/a-query-query/#comment-5575</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe:

I got Westlaw to post the Paice case at 

Paice LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp., No. 2:04-CV-211-DF, 2006 WL 2385139, *5-*6 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2006) (Folsom, J.).

The Judge never issued a formal opinion in Finsar, so I could not get that case posted.

I have seen notation to 2 other cases granting a permanent injunction that are supposedly carried on Lexis.  Am. Seating, 2006 US Dist Lexis 59212 and Litecubes, 2006 US Dixt LEXIS 60575.  There supposedly is another EDTex case granting a permanent injunction that, like Finsar, was not reported, Acco Brands,Inc. v. ABA Locks, No. 2:02-CV-112 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 15, 2006).  I have not seen these opinions, so I can't confirm the accuracy, but you probably could get someone to run that down. 

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe:</p>
<p>I got Westlaw to post the Paice case at </p>
<p>Paice LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp., No. 2:04-CV-211-DF, 2006 WL 2385139, *5-*6 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2006) (Folsom, J.).</p>
<p>The Judge never issued a formal opinion in Finsar, so I could not get that case posted.</p>
<p>I have seen notation to 2 other cases granting a permanent injunction that are supposedly carried on Lexis.  Am. Seating, 2006 US Dist Lexis 59212 and Litecubes, 2006 US Dixt LEXIS 60575.  There supposedly is another EDTex case granting a permanent injunction that, like Finsar, was not reported, Acco Brands,Inc. v. ABA Locks, No. 2:02-CV-112 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 15, 2006).  I have not seen these opinions, so I can&#8217;t confirm the accuracy, but you probably could get someone to run that down. </p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Diessel</title>
		<link>http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/10/22/a-query-query/#comment-5509</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Diessel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/10/22/a-query-query/#comment-5509</guid>
		<description>Thank you again for sharing this professor.  It is an enormous help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you again for sharing this professor.  It is an enormous help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
