<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does the PHOSITA invent? - Take 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/28/what-does-the-phosita-invent-take-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/28/what-does-the-phosita-invent-take-3/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary about patent law, i.p. law, creativity, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Fire of Genius &#187; New pleas for the &#8220;suggestion test&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/28/what-does-the-phosita-invent-take-3/#comment-3674</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fire of Genius &#187; New pleas for the &#8220;suggestion test&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/28/what-does-the-phosita-invent-take-3/#comment-3674</guid>
		<description>[...] core question is &#8220;yes.&#8221;    Filed under: Patent , IP Policy , Supreme Court Permalink &#124; Trackback URL&#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] core question is &#8220;yes.&#8221;    Filed under: Patent , IP Policy , Supreme Court Permalink | Trackback URL| [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madisonian.net &#187; A PHOSITA for Copyright</title>
		<link>http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/28/what-does-the-phosita-invent-take-3/#comment-3212</link>
		<dc:creator>madisonian.net &#187; A PHOSITA for Copyright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/28/what-does-the-phosita-invent-take-3/#comment-3212</guid>
		<description>[...] Over at The Fire of Genius, Joe Miller has a series of posts, inspired by the briefs in KSR International v. Teleflex, on the practical meaning of patent law&#8217;s PHOSITA standard: &#8220;What does the POSITA invent?&#8221; Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV. The essential thrust of the whole argument is that the Federal Circuit&#8217;s &#8220;suggestion&#8221; understates the extent to which a skilled artisan knows how to manipulate the tools of a given field to combine, recombine, and reconfigure existing technologies. But read the whole thing. And can someone please settle, once and for all, whether the proper phrase and acronym is PHOSITA (Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art) or POSITA (Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art)? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Over at The Fire of Genius, Joe Miller has a series of posts, inspired by the briefs in KSR International v. Teleflex, on the practical meaning of patent law&#8217;s PHOSITA standard: &#8220;What does the POSITA invent?&#8221; Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV. The essential thrust of the whole argument is that the Federal Circuit&#8217;s &#8220;suggestion&#8221; understates the extent to which a skilled artisan knows how to manipulate the tools of a given field to combine, recombine, and reconfigure existing technologies. But read the whole thing. And can someone please settle, once and for all, whether the proper phrase and acronym is PHOSITA (Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art) or POSITA (Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art)? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
