<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate patent reform bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/04/senate-patent-reform-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/04/senate-patent-reform-bill/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary about patent law, i.p. law, creativity, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 18:16:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Fire of Genius &#187; A &#8220;loser pays&#8221; attorney fee rule</title>
		<link>http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/04/senate-patent-reform-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-12539</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fire of Genius &#187; A &#8220;loser pays&#8221; attorney fee rule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/04/senate-patent-reform-bill/#comment-12539</guid>
		<description>[...] I first blogged about the Senate version of the patent reform bill back in August, just after it was introduced. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I first blogged about the Senate version of the patent reform bill back in August, just after it was introduced. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/04/senate-patent-reform-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-2384</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/04/senate-patent-reform-bill/#comment-2384</guid>
		<description>Nato,

This is an important question.  A good answer is complex, and I&#039;m in the middle of writing it.  Please check back to see it tackled in a new post.

Thanks,

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nato,</p>
<p>This is an important question.  A good answer is complex, and I&#8217;m in the middle of writing it.  Please check back to see it tackled in a new post.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nato Welch</title>
		<link>http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/04/senate-patent-reform-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-2340</link>
		<dc:creator>Nato Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 18:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/08/04/senate-patent-reform-bill/#comment-2340</guid>
		<description>What does &quot;first to file&quot; do to the convention of the prior art defense? There&#039;s been some dispute here and [[there http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/06/0236201 ]] regarding the effect of this bill on free and open source software. 

If the prior art defense disappears just because FOS programmers don&#039;t or can&#039;t afford to be &quot;first to file&quot; for patents instead of being first to invent (and publish), we&#039;ve got a big problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does &#8220;first to file&#8221; do to the convention of the prior art defense? There&#8217;s been some dispute here and [[there <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/06/0236201" rel="nofollow">http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/06/0236201</a> ]] regarding the effect of this bill on free and open source software. </p>
<p>If the prior art defense disappears just because FOS programmers don&#8217;t or can&#8217;t afford to be &#8220;first to file&#8221; for patents instead of being first to invent (and publish), we&#8217;ve got a big problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
