Academic commentary about patent law, i.p. law, creativity, and more

July 17, 2006

Nonobviousness: Greatest Hits, #7

posted by Joe at 10:40 am

If you want to learn more about how the Federal Circuit has applied the suggestion / motivation requirement, take a look at Harold R. Brown, Finding Motivation, Teaching, or Suggestion in the Prior Art, 86 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 809 (2004).  Brown carefully canvasses, and categorizes, the recent cases.


2 Comments »

  1. Hi Joe,

    Please post something regarding the implications of TITLE of the invention in patent applications.
    Moreover, Please let us know what do you think can be a difference or implication of the following

    “A Method and System for…..”

    “A Method and A System for…..”

    “Method and System for …..”

    Thanks in advance,
    cK

    Comment by cK — July 18, 2006 @ 12:08 am

  2. […] cK, in a comment to a recent post, made the following request: Please post something regarding the implications of TITLE of the invention in patent applications. […]

    Pingback by The Fire of Genius » An invention by any other name … ? — July 18, 2006 @ 10:00 am

Comments RSS Feed | TrackBack URL

Leave a comment