http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/05/15/another-cvsg/ Academic commentary about patent law, i.p. law, creativity, and more Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:04:51 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/05/15/another-cvsg/comment-page-1/#comment-61 The Fire of Genius » 10th Justice, or 14th Circuit? Fri, 26 May 2006 06:02:03 +0000 http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/05/15/another-cvsg/#comment-61 [...] appellate strategy in a given case. Filed under: Patent , IP Policy , Supreme Court Permalink | Trackback URL| [...] [...] appellate strategy in a given case. Filed under: Patent , IP Policy , Supreme Court Permalink | Trackback URL| [...]

]]> http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/05/15/another-cvsg/comment-page-1/#comment-25 The Fire of Genius » Declaratory judgment jurisdiction Wed, 17 May 2006 05:04:34 +0000 http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/05/15/another-cvsg/#comment-25 [...] As I noted here yesterday, the Supreme Court has asked the SG to offer the views of the U.S. on the certworthiness of the declaratory judgment jurisdiction question presented by Apotex Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc., No. 05-1006. [...] [...] As I noted here yesterday, the Supreme Court has asked the SG to offer the views of the U.S. on the certworthiness of the declaratory judgment jurisdiction question presented by Apotex Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc., No. 05-1006. [...]

]]> http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/05/15/another-cvsg/comment-page-1/#comment-18 The Fire of Genius » The eBay earthquake Part 2 Mon, 15 May 2006 17:50:43 +0000 http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2006/05/15/another-cvsg/#comment-18 [...] Slip op. at 2. The skepticism of modern patent standards and licensing practices expressed here is, I think, quite intense. It’s not merely fees, it’s “exorbitant fees.” It’s not merely leverage, it’s “undue leverage.” This concurrence is just one vote shy of a majority. With all the major patent cases that are serious candidates for cert, the tenor of Justice Kennedy’s views will no doubt feature heavily in future cases. [...] [...] Slip op. at 2. The skepticism of modern patent standards and licensing practices expressed here is, I think, quite intense. It’s not merely fees, it’s “exorbitant fees.” It’s not merely leverage, it’s “undue leverage.” This concurrence is just one vote shy of a majority. With all the major patent cases that are serious candidates for cert, the tenor of Justice Kennedy’s views will no doubt feature heavily in future cases. [...]

]]>